February 23, 2012

Walker talks reform

While speaking at Washington free market think tank, Governor Scott Walker defended his policies on public employees including collective bargaining changes and requiring higher pensions and health contributions.

In today’s talk, “Are Wisconsin’s Budget Reforms a Model for Other States,” Walker said the issue is not only favored only by Republicans – as Democrats such as N.Y. Governor Cuomo, Mass. Governor Patrick and even Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel also want labor changes.

“Who would’ve thought a year ago when Occupy Chicago protestors came in, they’d mention my name and Rahm Emanuel’s name in the same breath,” said Walker, adding these changes “make sense.”

Gov. Walker said his fiscal policies are a way to protect the retirement benefits of those in public service. He mentioned states like Illinois – which fail to make tough budgetary decisions – are now looking to cut pension benefits.

The American Enterprise Institute hosted Walker for the event.

AUDIO: Brian Moon reports (1:15)

Dems on recall myths and timeline

As the deadline approaches to turn in petitions to recall Gov. Scott Walker and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch, Democrats are dispelling a few myths.  The Dems have released their internal timeline leading up to the Government Accountability Board’s January 17 deadline. The recall headquarters in Madison plans on gathering petitions the week prior to organize the paperwork before submission.

In a conference call to reporters Tuesday, State Democratic Party Chairman Mike Tate dispelled the rumor that organizers plan on turning in petitions next week to the GAB. Tate also would not disclose how many signatures they’ve gathered but said they are on track. “We have a very rate of people signing both petitions and I expect that we have a very strong number.”

Democratic spokesman Graeme Zielinski said various blogs and sources are reporting erroneous information. “Another phenomenon are well-meaning volunteers who are leaking raw numbers of signatures versus the actual number of signatures that will be submitted after vetting,” he said in a release.

Once the GAB receives the petitions, it will work to verify the signatures. Meantime there is a legal battle ensuing over the agency’s process. Walker’s campaign and the head of the state Republican Party say it should not be their job to find improper signatures. But the Accountability Board says the law only requires them to check the petitions for full names and valid Wisconsin addresses – and they don’t have the resources to do any more than that.

Waukesha County Circuit Judge Mac Davis last week rejected a request by the recall groups to intervene, saying there’s not time to consider it before the petitions are filed. Davis also said the GAB’s position is the same as the recall groups, so they should be adequately represented in a hearing on the merits of the case, which is scheduled for tomorrow. The recall groups have asked a state appeals court to let them join the suit.

AUDIO:  Tate on why Gov. Walker is focusing on signature validation (:39)

Governor defends GAB lawsuit

In Senate recalls filed last summer, each campaign took up the task of reviewing the petitions filed with the state and making challenges against signatures. Now Republicans want the Government Accountability Board to do that work when petitions targeting Governor Scott Walker are filed later this month.

Governor Walker’s campaign and the state Republican Party have filed a lawsuit in Waukesha County that seeks to force the GAB to make sure signatures on the petitions are valid, and to strike any duplicate of false signatures as part of the review process. Walker says “the integrity of the process is compromised if there are individuals signing more than once” or “if someone is signing with a false name that doesn’t representing a legal voter in the state of Wisconsin.”

AUDIO: Andrew Beckett reports (1:01)

GAB staff have said their only duty is to make sure each signature is complete and has a Wisconsin address with it, and that it’s up to the campaigns to file any challenges. Walker says that process worked fine last summer during the Senate recalls because there was not evidence people were signing multiple petitions, while media accounts this fall have indicated some people may have signed petitions multiple times.

Agency officials say being forced to strike signatures would significantly add to the cost of reviewing the recall petitions, with over 540,000 signatures expected to be turned in later this month. The GAB also argues such a review goes beyond what the law requires the agency to conduct.

When asked whether taxpayers should be forced to pay for the extra expense of a review process that’s much different than what was used last summer, Walker said “anybody upset with the cost should go back to the people pushing for the recall in the first place.”

2011 in review: the year of the recall

Before this year, Wisconsin had only seen a handful of successful attempts to recall public officials. That changed dramatically last spring, as recall efforts against 16 state senators got underway.

The recalls were based on where lawmakers stood on the collective bargaining issue; Democrats for leaving the state to prevent a vote and Republicans for supporting the bill. UW-Madison Political Scientist Charles Franklin called it a very unusual situation to see so many lawmakers targeted all at one time.

Thousands of signatures were needed and several of the campaigns fell short of their goal. More than enough signatures were gathered though to force elections against six Republican and three Democratic lawmakers.

David Vanderleest, who helped organize the effort targeting Green Bay Democrat Dave Hansen, says the polarized environment caused by the collective bargaining debate made it easy to get people to sign. He noted how clearly the state was divided at the time. Vanderleest unsuccessfully challenged Hansen in the race, which was the first to be resolved.

Following a legal battle over signature challenges to the petitions, primaries for the rest were set for July. Republicans drew criticism for running “fake Democrats” in some of those races, a move Senate GOP Leader Scott Fitzgerald defended as necessary because it gave their members an extra month to campaign after the budget debate. Without primaries, those elections would have been held in early July.

The six Republicans were the first to face elections on August ninth. Democrats fell short of winning the three seats needed to control the Senate, but state Democratic Party Chairman Mike Tate said defeating Senators Dan Kapanke of La Crosse and Randy Hopper of Fond du Lac was still a big win. Republicans argued their ability to hang on to the majority was a sign that results beat out rhetoric with voters.

The two remaining Democrats successfully won re-election a week later.

Despite falling short of their goal to flip the Senate, Democrats have kept their focus on recalls. In November they launched a drive to collect the more than 540,000 signatures needed to recall Governor Scott Walker. Four more GOP Senators are also facing recalls. The state will find out in mid-January if those efforts will succeed.

AUDIO: Andrew Beckett reports (2:00)

GAB lawsuit in court

A court hearing will be held in Waukesha today on a lawsuit filed against the state elections’ agency over the review of recall petitions. Governor Scott Walker’s campaign and the head of the state GOP want to force the Government Accountability Board to eliminate false and duplicate signatures from recall petitions, without making a complaining party point them out first.

Circuit Judge Mac Davis is not expected to make an immediate ruling. But he could decide today whether to let other groups join the lawsuit.

A petition drive to recall the Republican governor ends next month, and Walker’s campaign says it should not be up to them to find improper petition signatures.

Board director Kevin Kennedy has said the law presumes the signatures are valid if they’re dated and have a Wisconsin address. Kennedy says a more detailed review would require a change in the law and a lot more resources.