• Home
  • News
    • Politics / Govt
    • Legislature
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
    • Archives
  • Sports
    • Badgers
    • Packers
      • Titletown Report
    • Brewers
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support

Wisconsin Radio Network

Wisconsin News and Sports

You are here: Home / Agriculture / No ruling yet on Amish challenge to premise registration

No ruling yet on Amish challenge to premise registration

September 24, 2009 By WRN Contributor

A judge will wait to make a ruling, on a challenge by Amish farmers to the constitutionality of Wisconsin’s Premise Registration law. Clark County Circuit Court Judge Jon Counsell heard a full day of testimony Wednesday, with roughly 100 members of the Amish community packed into a court room, and dozens others standing in the hallway.

Under questioning by Bonnie Wacsmuth, an attorney representing the farmers, Noah Schwartz, an Amish church bishop, said Premise ID could be a forerunner to the Mark of the Beast. “I can’t really define and say that this is actually the Mark of the Beast,” said Schwartz. “I do feel it’s probably at least a strong lead to such, and would not want to be involved in promoting a system which I think would lead to that.” And, Schwartz said, the law represented a shift of people’s trust from God to government. “I’d consider it an anti-Christ movement.”

The law, which went into effect in 2005, requires properties that have livestock be registered with the Department of Agriculture. The state alleges an Old Order Amish farmer from the Loyal area has not complied, and presented five witnesses in an effort to show there was a “compelling interest,” in this case an ability to combat a potentially crippling animal disease outbreak.

For the rule to pass muster, the judge will have to determine that interest trumps the Amish’s sincerely held religious beliefs. Judge Counsell did not issue a ruling. He gave Wacsmuth 30 days to submit a brief in support of her motion to dismiss the case. Clark County District Attorney Darwin Zwieg will then have 30 days to respond. The time limits will begin when the court reporter finishes the transcript, so it’s safe to assume a ruling could be months away.

AUDIO: Bob Hague reports (1:30 MP3)

WCCN’s Paul Knoff submitted this report

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Agriculture, Crime / Courts



Featured Stories

Evers delivers State of the State address

Abortion rights rally highlights Wisconsin Supreme Court race

Bail and benefits questions will be on Wisconsin’s April statewide ballot

Evers issues promised TikTok ban

Johnson, Baldwin both vote ‘yes’ to avert rail strike

TwitterFacebook

Sports Headlines

Giannis breaks franchise scoring record, Bucks beat Nets in OT

Wisconsin’s Davis declares for NBA Draft

Badgers to face Arizona State in Las Vegas Bowl

Williams likely out for the season with broken hand

Packers releasing TE Jace Sternberger

More Sports

Tweets by @WRN

Get our news delivered to your inbox:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Copyright © 2023 · Learfield News & Ag, LLC