• Home
  • News
    • Politics / Govt
    • Legislature
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
    • Archives
  • Sports
    • Badgers
    • Packers
      • Titletown Report
    • Brewers
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support

Wisconsin Radio Network

Wisconsin News and Sports

You are here: Home / Environment / Conservation / Weighing nanotechnology risks and benefits

Weighing nanotechnology risks and benefits

October 6, 2009 By Bob Hague

An expert on nanotechonology makes a stop in Madison. Dr. Andrew Maynard is a nanotech expert from the Woodrow Wilson International Center in Washington D.C. He says there are benefits and risks associated with nantechnology. “We’re doing things differently, we’re manipulating matter in new ways so it behaves in different ways, and of course there’s a question about whether that creates new risks,” Maynard says. “That’s where the nub of the legitimate concern is: are we doing things which could cause harm in new ways, and how are we going to manage that?”

Maynard, in Madison for a briefing to the Assembly Committee on Public Health, says there are two issues surrounding nanotech. “One is how nanotechnology is going to revitalize local economies, create jobs, create wealth. But it’s also the question of how you’re going avoid harm to constituents and harm to the environment. And I think state authorities have got responsibilities in both of those areas.”

 AUDIO: Bob Hague Q&A (3:25 MP3)

Maynard, asked for a definition of nanotechnology which an average person might be able to understand, refers to one given by Nobel Laureate Richard Smalley, who called nanotechnology “the art and the science of building stuff that does stuff at a nanometer scale.” Maynard says that definition “captures that idea of doing things differently at a very fine scale, so we can do new things.”

“Many people talk about nanotechnology as being an enabling technology, so it allows you to do other things,” says Maynard. “Perhaps most importantly, it gives you a new set of tools, to address some of the big challenges we face as a society, including global climate change, including how we develop new sources of energy and use energy more efficiently.” 

Maynard says there’s little comparison between nanotech and the still contentious issue of genetically modified foods. “Genetically modified foods . . . was about doing things differently,” he says. “But that was also about companies making decisions without people being a part of that decision making process. Nanotechnology is much wider than genetic engineering . . . but it’s also a very different process in terms of how the technology is being developed, in how decisions are being made.”

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Environment / Conservation, Politics / Govt

Trackbacks

  1. Weighing nanotechnology risks and benefits | Nano Broadcast says:
    October 6, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    […] Weighing nanotechnology risks and benefits […]



Featured Stories

Evers appoints Kirsten Johnson to lead Wisconsin Department of Health Services

UW System releases results of student survey on free speech and free expression

State Senate Natural Resources Committee gets PFAS update

Evers delivers State of the State address

Abortion rights rally highlights Wisconsin Supreme Court race

TwitterFacebook

Sports Headlines

Giannis breaks franchise scoring record, Bucks beat Nets in OT

Wisconsin’s Davis declares for NBA Draft

Badgers to face Arizona State in Las Vegas Bowl

Williams likely out for the season with broken hand

Packers releasing TE Jace Sternberger

More Sports

Tweets by @WRN

Get our news delivered to your inbox:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Copyright © 2023 · Learfield News & Ag, LLC