• Home
  • News
    • Politics / Govt
    • Legislature
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
    • Archives
  • Sports
    • Badgers
    • Packers
      • Titletown Report
    • Brewers
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support

Wisconsin Radio Network

Wisconsin News and Sports

You are here: Home / Environment / Conservation / Mining bill carries water concerns

Mining bill carries water concerns

February 25, 2013 By Bob Hague

Map Image; GLIFWC

Map Image; GLIFWC

Controversial legislation which would overhaul Wisconsin’s mining regulations remains on the fast track at the Capitol, even as opponents continue to raise concerns on the possible environmental consequences that a massive open-pit iron ore mine would have on northern Wisconsin.

Governor Scott Walker has urged prompt passage of the legislation. With the Joint Committee on Finance set to vote Monday on the bill to rewrite the state’s mining laws, concerns remain about impact any permitted mine could have on surface waters. “What the bill does is makes a presumption that destroying wetlands, destroying streams, is a necessary aspect of running an iron mine, and that as long as you promise to go build one somewhere else, it’s okay to wipe streams off the map,” said state Representative Fred Clark.

“AB-1 would set a precedent for allowing the destruction of navigable waters – streams, lakes, ponds and rivers – that has really never been allowed to occur in Wisconsin before,” said Clark, a Sauk City Democrat. “That’s a precedent that could easily be carried over into other activities. It’s the foot in the door that I think people who homes around lakes, for example, are really concerned about.”

Clark said the provision is in conflict with Wisconsin’s Public Trust Doctrine, and is one of numerous parts of the mining legislation which will invite litigation if a permit for a mine is applied for. “If we’re really serious about allowing a mine to operate responsibly, and actually letting a project like that develop, this bill is not going to help us get there,” he said.

Clark and Eau Claire Democrat, Representative Dana Wachs, have released a map which they said shows streams and lakes near the Penokee Range which could be permitted for alteration or destruction based on standards for navigable water impacts contained in the legislation. The proposed iron ore mine would be in the Penokees, in Iron and Ashland Counties. The map was prepared by Environmental specialists at the Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission. GLIFWC’s member tribes include the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa. Bad River Tribal Chairman Mike Wiggins has been a vocal critic of the mine.

READ:  GLIFWC Map Penokee Area Mine AB-! 

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Environment / Conservation, Legislature, News, Politics / Govt





compeer financial celebrates beef month

Featured Stories

Wisconsin DNR warns of elevated fire danger this week

Baldwin announces U.S. Senate reelection bid

‘Tragic, terrible’ – Sheriff on Barron County police officers deaths

Two police officers killed in Barron County shootout

UW System Regents approve tuition increase

TwitterFacebook

Sports Headlines

Evers’ AmFam funding plan ‘a nonstarter’ with Assembly Republicans

New pitch clock could speed up MLB games this season, says UW expert

Giannis breaks franchise scoring record, Bucks beat Nets in OT

Wisconsin’s Davis declares for NBA Draft

Badgers to face Arizona State in Las Vegas Bowl

More Sports

Tweets by @WRN

Get our news delivered to your inbox:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Copyright © 2023 · Learfield News & Ag, LLC

 

Loading Comments...