• Home
  • News
    • Politics / Govt
    • Legislature
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
    • Archives
  • Sports
    • Badgers
    • Packers
      • Titletown Report
    • Brewers
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support

Wisconsin Radio Network

Wisconsin News and Sports

You are here: Home / Sports / It took public pressure and sponsorship concerns to sideline Adrian Peterson (Opinion)

It took public pressure and sponsorship concerns to sideline Adrian Peterson (Opinion)

September 17, 2014 By Bill Scott

It was just Monday that the Minnesota Vikings thought it was OK for Adrian Peterson to return to the team, ready to play the following Sunday.  Nothing had really changed from the week before when they decided to make him inactive for the teams game against New England.  Yet the change was made and Peterson was back in business.

Less than 48 hours later, Peterson was back on the shelf, this time on the NFL’s exempt/commissioner’s permission list, until his child-abuse case is resolved.  He must stay away from the team while he addresses the charges in Texas.

So what’s changed from Monday until now?

How about public pressure.  How about Minnesota’s governor, who backed the Viking ownership team in the construction of a new indoor facility, and his concerns about having Peterson return to active duty.  And perhaps most of all, how about sponsor discontent.

Several sponsors responded to the Vikings move on Monday by suspending their deals with the team or severing ties with Peterson.  That forced Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf to revisit the situation on Tuesday.

The Vikings ownership in a statement said, “While we were trying to make a balanced decision yesterday, after further reflection we have concluded that this resolution is best for the Vikings and for Adrian.”

Again, what changed or was about to change?  The Wilf’s pocket books!  They were about to realize a backlash that every millionaire/billionaire can understand, M-O-N-E-Y.

Certainly the move was the correct one, but it should never have come to this.  The ownership team should have said to themselves, 1) what is the right thing to do, 2) what would our fans and sponsors expect us to do.

Certainly not all decision-making can be taken care of based on the above criteria, but it’s a good start.

It’s too bad the Vikings product on the field will suffer, but the team’s suffering is minor in comparison to that of the 4-year-old son of Adrian Peterson, who was allegedly beaten with a switch for disciplinary reasons.

What kind of message was being sent on Monday when Peterson was reinstated?  The Wilf’s deny the change in direction had anything to do with fan and sponsorship discontent.  Does anyone really believe that?

In the end, benching Peterson until this case is resolved was the right thing to do.  What’s concerning is how we got to this point!

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Sports Tagged With: Adrian Peterson, Minnesota Vikings



Featured Stories

Senate Republicans shut down debate on conversion therapy in Wisconsin

UW Madison based Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center receives funding renewal

Secretary of State La Follette resigns from office, Godlewski named as replacement

Republican proposal to alter 1849 abortion statute won’t advance in Senate

Protasiewicz and Kelly advance in Wisconsin Supreme Court primary

TwitterFacebook

Sports Headlines

Evers’ AmFam funding plan ‘a nonstarter’ with Assembly Republicans

New pitch clock could speed up MLB games this season, says UW expert

Giannis breaks franchise scoring record, Bucks beat Nets in OT

Wisconsin’s Davis declares for NBA Draft

Badgers to face Arizona State in Las Vegas Bowl

More Sports

Tweets by @WRN

Get our news delivered to your inbox:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Copyright © 2023 · Learfield News & Ag, LLC