• Home
  • News
    • Politics / Govt
    • Legislature
    • Crime / Courts
    • Health / Medicine
    • Archives
  • Sports
    • Badgers
    • Packers
      • Titletown Report
    • Brewers
  • Contact Us
    • Reporters
  • Affiliates
    • Affiliate Support

Wisconsin Radio Network

Wisconsin News and Sports

You are here: Home / Agriculture / Marking beasts versus Mark of the Beast

Marking beasts versus Mark of the Beast

May 18, 2009 By WRN Contributor

Wisconsin livestock owners already have to register their properties with the state, but many groups are resisting the next step. Beginning this week, the United State Department of Agriculture is holding hearings around the country on the National Animal Identification System , or NAIS.

"The National Animal Identification System really is focused on animal disease," explains Gil Hammerschmidt, NAIS coordinator with the USDA. "It will allow us to identify animals and track or record their movements, really to help animal health officials really to help animal health officials to have the information, in order to respond in a more timely manner to animal disease events." Animal ID is the second part of a three-step modernization process. The first being premise registration, the third is animal tracing. Hammerschmidt says animal identification could work several different ways; including placing traceable chips placed in livestock cattle

While many producer groups support the concept, others fear an overbearing government. Many Clark County Amish farmers refuse to comply with premise registration, saying it will lead to the tagging of all animals, or the biblical 'Mark of the Beast.' Clark County's District Attorney, Darwin Zwieg, filed the first test case for the law in Clark County Circuit Court. The Amish farmer, Emmanuel Miller, Jr. of Loyal, will go before the court in July.

"That electronic I-D number will feed into an international database" says, Pete Kennedy is the Interim President of the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund , which opposes NAIS. "Our members sees this as a part of the 'Mark of the Beast' system, establishing a universal system of control that was warned about in the book of Revelations."

Kennedy has concerns with NAIS which are more prosaic than some of his group's members. He says the system will prove too costly for small farmers, likely driving them out of business, and won't really help animal health. While there may be some good intentions on the part of producers, Kennedy also sees ulterior motives pushing NAIS forward. "There's definitely a lot of money to be made," he says, noting that chip manufacturers have already made millions on the project. "There's basically two food systems in this country right now, the industrial food system and the local food system. This program is a competitive advantage for the industrial food system."

AUDIO: Paul Knoff reports (1:30 MP3)

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Filed Under: Agriculture, Sports



Featured Stories

More than 100 participate in DNR wolf management plan listening session

Evers appoints Kirsten Johnson to lead Wisconsin Department of Health Services

UW System releases results of student survey on free speech and free expression

State Senate Natural Resources Committee gets PFAS update

Evers delivers State of the State address

TwitterFacebook

Sports Headlines

Giannis breaks franchise scoring record, Bucks beat Nets in OT

Wisconsin’s Davis declares for NBA Draft

Badgers to face Arizona State in Las Vegas Bowl

Williams likely out for the season with broken hand

Packers releasing TE Jace Sternberger

More Sports

Tweets by @WRN

Get our news delivered to your inbox:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Copyright © 2023 · Learfield News & Ag, LLC